Word cloud controversy

Nice, thank you for this word cloud, Serkan! As a side note, you may be aware that - while often interesting and sometimes visually pleasing, like the one that you posted - word cloud interpretation is problematic, and word clouds are a controversial topic in the data visualization community.

Here are examples of negative usability results with word clouds:

1) https://www2007.org/posters/poster988.pdf

2) https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1240624.1240775

3) http://dl.ifip.org/db/conf/interact/interact2009-1/LohmannZT09.pdf

4) http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hearst/papers/tagclouds.pdf

"Word clouds considered harmful", by The New York Times' senior software architect Jacob Harris: https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/10/word-clouds-considered-harmful/

Ways to improve word clouds: "Word Clouds: We Can’t Make Them Go Away, So Let’s Improve Them": https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/news/2019/word-clouds-we-cant-make-them... - academic paper: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8665933

"Alternative Designs for Word Clouds and Some Research-Based Guidelines": https://medium.com/@FILWD/taking-word-clouds-apart-alternative-designs-f... - academic paper: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5502f56fe4b0aa4bfbdae0a8/t/599a54...

This is an interesting subject!